======================================================================== Cybernetics in the 3rd Millennium (C3M) Volume 11 Number 1, Jul. 2013 Alan B. Scrivener — www.well.com/user/absmailto:abs@well.com ======================================================================== screen shots from TED Talk "Nicholas Christakis: How social networks predict epidemics" http://www.ted.com/talks/nicholas_christakis_
In this issue:

Short Subjects from the Email Bag

  • Nora Bateson announced that her documentary about her father, Gregory Bateson, "An Ecology of Mind" (2011), is now available on DVD at Amazon. Huzzah! ( www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00CAUTPI6/hip-20 ) I have my copy but haven't seen it yet; hope to review it next time. Also, Nora is holding a workshop in Berkeley in August. ( centerforpersonalgrowth.typepad.com/blog/an-ecology-of-mind-learning-play-and-epistemology.html )
  • Steve Premo wrote (re: "Teaching Calculus to a 16-Year-Old"):
    Howard Swann (Prof. E McSquared) is a friend of mine, as is John Johnson, the illustrator of the calculus primer! They both should be listed as authors, as is customary with comic books. The creators are the writer and the artist. It's like music, where both the composer and lyricist get credit for a song.
    Fixed in the archives, thanks for the suggestion!
  • Will Ackel wrote (re: "Teaching Calculus to a 16-Year-Old"):
    What a fascinating challenge — to educate a new mind. With the skyrocketing cost of a college education, it has become fashionable to say that we are facing a crisis in higher education. But with the Internet, Khan Academy, Udacity, Wikipedia, Google Books, etc. it is now easier than ever to get an advanced education for free. But the piece of the paper that people take as proof that you know something now costs upwards of $100,000. So what we really have is a crisis of certification, not education. As always, most people seem to think that the solution is more government funding to subsidize an outmoded, inefficient, and fundamentally unaffordable educational establishment. But what is really needed is a new kind of diploma that stands for what you know, and what you can do, rather that where you've been, and how much you can afford. Ideally it would go beyond that to reflect personal qualities like integrity, creativity, and open mindedness. Our antiquated system of higher education was well adapted to a time when education, recognition, and opportunity were conferred on only a privileged few. It doesn't work so well in a time when anyone who lacks credentials is consigned to the kinds of jobs that no longer exist in this country. Your 'zine also reminded me of a wacky idea I once had while pondering the quantum-mechanical phenomenon know as "spooky action at a distance." What troubled me was this notion of "spookiness." It only seems spooky because by the time people are introduced to it, they've been conditioned to expect the universe to behave otherwise. The same could be said of all of quantum mechanics, relativity, multi-dimensional string theory, etc. — things we find counter-intuitive because by the time we hear about them we have lost most of the plasticity of mind that wold be required to grok them. And yet these things are reality. An educated person ought to see them as the perfectly natural phenomena that they are. Hence my thought: wouldn't it be interesting to immerse a child in reality from the earliest age? How could this be done with virtual reality, computer games, architecture, etc.? Isn't it ironic that virtual reality could be just the right tool to help people see real reality? What sorts of insights might be apparent to a person who perceives the universe as the relativistic, quantum-mechanical, multi-dimensional construct that we know it is?
  • Another surprising translation:
    Hello, I have translated a post in your blog in Polish language. The translated version you can find in my blog here: cheap.de/science/co-hath-wolfram-kutego Please if it is possible put a link on my translation. All the best. Katia Osipova
  • David Ing wrote:
    Alan, I happened across your page at http://www.well.com/~abs/curriculum.html. I've posted a link to it on Facebook, in the Systems Sciences group at http://www.facebook.com/groups/2391509563. If you're in the Bay Area, you might (or might not) be interested in http://isss.org/world/2012-call-for-participation. We'll certainly have descendants of your way of thinking. [Ed: Due to a hiatus in this 'zine the above conference came and went before I was able to share this information. In July of 2013 the 57th World Conference of the International Society for the Systems Sciences is being held in Hai Phong, Viet Nam, with the theme "Curating the Conditions for a Thrivable Planet." http://isss.org/world/hai-phong-city-57th-annual-meeting ] I blog at http://coevolving.com. I know that you'll appreciate that domain name. David Ing President (2011-2012) International Society for the Systems Sciences
  • from the ieee_vis email list (IEEE = Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers; vis = visualization):
    Dear Colleagues: This is to announce the availability of a website at the Center for Perceptual Systems for processing images with new algorithms based on natural scenes statistics: http://rcm.cps.utexas.edu. The primary aim of the website is to obtain feedback on the quality of the algorithms, and to provide a simple means for other laboratories to compare their algorithms with those developed here. However, you may also find the algorithms useful for processing your own images. This interactive website allows the user to apply the algorithms to any image and get results in real-time. Currently the tools consist of denoising (noise reduction), and up-sampling (image enlargement). Other tools will be added as they become available. An associated website provides publications describing the natural scene statistics and the algorithms: http://www.cps.utexas.edu/natural_scenes/. This website also provides examples of the processed images, comparisons with other algorithms, and downloadable databases of natural images. Feedback and/or suggestions are welcome. Bill Geisler & Jeff Perry ieee_vis mailing list Note that this email list is used for the conference calls for the EG/IEEE VGTC Symposium on Visualization, IEEE Visualization conference, and other events. If you have questions about the conference, the submission, or related topics, please contact the respective conference co-chairs. For address changes, removal or duplicates, visit https://listserv.uni-tuebingen.de/mailman/listinfo/ieee_vis
  • I considered applying for this, and probably will next year instead:
    The eleventh annual Wolfram Science Summer School (formerly the NKS Summer School) is [soon], and we would like to invite you to apply. The three-week, tuition-free summer program will be held at Bentley University in Waltham, Massachusetts from July 1 through July 19, 2013. The Wolfram Science Summer School is hosted by Wolfram Research, makers of Mathematica and the computational knowledge engine Wolfram|Alpha, and Stephen Wolfram, world-renowned author of A New Kind of Science (NKS). http://www.wolframscience.com/summerschool We are looking for highly motivated individuals who want to get involved with original research at the frontiers of science. Our participants come from many diverse backgrounds, but share a common passion to discover and explore cutting-edge ideas. Over the past 10 years, they have included graduate students, undergraduates, professors, industry professionals, artists, and even a few exceptional high school students. If accepted to the Summer School, you will work directly with others in the Wolfram Science community, including Stephen Wolfram and a staff of instructors who have made significant contributions to NKS and Wolfram|Alpha. You will develop your own original project that could become the foundation of published papers or your thesis. Take a look at the lecture notes from previous years to get a sense of what topics will be covered: http://www.wolframscience.com/summerschool/resources If you're serious about getting involved with innovative ideas at the core of Wolfram Science and NKS, you should consider applying as soon as possible. Apply online at: http://www.wolframscience.com/summerschool/application.cgi Todd Rowland, PhD Wolfram Science Summer School Academic Director Catherine Boucher, PhD Wolfram Science Summer School Program Director

What Just Happened?

Robert Downy, Jr., Chris Evans, Mark Ruffalo, Jeremy Renner, and Samuel Jackson at the Oscars, 24 Feb. 2013 www.gq.com/style/blogs/the-gq-eye/2013/02/gq-addresses-the-avengers-men-at-the-oscars.html
"I knew what I was looking at. I realized that without making the slightest effort I had come upon one of those utterances in search of which psychoanalysts and State Department monitors of the Moscow or Belgrade press are willing to endure a lifetime of tedium: namely, the seemingly innocuous obiter dicta, the words in passing, that give the game away." — Tom Wolfe, The Painted Word (book, 1975)
( www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0312427581/hip-20 ) This past winter I attended the Annie Awards, held at U.C.L.A. on 2 February 2013, to honor animation the way the Oscars honor film. This was my third annual visit with my wife and daughter. ( annieawards.org ) ( www.asifa-hollywood.org/wreck-it-ralph-wins-best-animated-film-at-annie-awards I remember the the award for "Outstanding Achievement, Animated Effects in a Live Action Production" went to a group of folks at Industrial Light & Magic for "The Avengers." (The other nominees were for "The Amazing Spiderman," "John Carter" and "Battleship.") Also, there was an award for "Outstanding Achievement, Character Animation in a Live Action Production" and 3D artists and animators at Rhythm & Hues were nominated twice, for an orangutan and a tiger in "Life of Pi." (The tiger won.) ( annieawards.org/nominees ) And I think one of the presenters, or else a live blogger I saw on my iPhone during the ceremony, made a snotty remark about how it's a farce to give a "best actor" Oscar to someone playing (for example) the Hulk, when most of his performance is computer-animated. A few weeks later on Sun. 24 Feb. 2013 we watched the Academy Awards with friends. Several odd things happened that night. First, five actors from the movie "The Avengers" — pictured above — came out to present a visual effects award. (I immediately blurted "Where's Black Widow? She's not an Avenger?") I would really like to know what was on the teleprompter at that moment, but whatever it was, Samuel L. Jackson refused to say it. Robert Downey, Jr. tried to continue reading the scripted remarks, and then Jackson cut him off. Here was the exchange:
Jackson: "And here are the nominees for..." Ruffalo: "Whoa, whoa, whoa, wait." Jackson: "Yeah?" Ruffalo: "You just skipped a big chunk." Downey: "You did." Jackson: "I did?" Downey: "Yeah, you just went [unintelligible]... Yeah, it's important that visual effects be given the respect they deserve. This was a huge year for visual..." Jackson: "Is that really something you want to say?" Downey: "Just roll it back. This is what they want." Jackson: "Let's just give them the respect they deserve and give them the damned award. Come on!" Downey: "They create worlds, and—" Jackson: [cutting off Downey, who shrugs] "Here are the nominees for achievement in Visual Effects."
(Video of this has been popping up on the web and then been "Whack-A-Moled" away by somebody using DCMA takedown requests, but I found one still up. culturewarreporters.com/tag/acceptance-speech ) The award went to a team from Rhythm and Hues for "The Life of Pi," and the acceptance speech was given by team leader Bill Westenhofer. He managed to point out:
"The irony is not lost on any of us up here that in a film whose central premise is to ask the audience what's real and not real, most of what you see is, well, it's fake. That's the magic of visual effects"
He thanked a number of people, including the director Ang Lee, and ended up adding:
"I want to thank all the artists working on this film for over a year, including Rhythm and Hues. Sadly, Rhythm and Hues is having severe financial difficulties right now, and you'll remember..."
But then, less than a minute into his speech he was drowned out by the "Jaws" music used to silence recipients in overtime. Shortly afterwards David S. Cohen of Variety Tweeted about this:
"Ok, #Oscars conspiracy theorists: music came up on #vfx winners in 44.5 secs. Next winner, Claudio Miranda, spoke almost 60 secs, no music."
I immediately jumped on my iPhone and found out there were people dressed in green-screen suits from Rhythm and Hues protesting in front of the Dolby (nee Kodak) Theater right that moment, including artists that had worked on that very movie that was taking home Oscars and had not been paid. Their signs referred to a "Piece of the Pi." Later, post-awards interviews filled us in on Westenhofer's beef. ( www.cartoonbrew.com/ideas-commentary/an-uninterrupted-statement-
) Then, things got even weirder. Ang Li won for Best Director for "Life of Pi" and didn't thank the effects artists. I was floored. This was a movie that was nearly all Computer-Generated Imagery (CGI), and he didn't think the digital artists deserved a mention? The blogosphere went nuts with this. My own daughter posted about it on Tumblr, and assembled a nice list of links to other analysis. ( thefoolwhomakesfoolsofthemall.tumblr.com/tagged/oscars-2013 ) After the fact, one of the best summaries of the issues facing R&H came from a Disney blog which mentioned that they'd made the images for the attraction "It's Tough to Be a Bug." ( micechat.com/24684-its-tough-to-be-a-bust-the-rhythm-and-hues-bankruptcy/ ) But I'm still left scratching my head and asking "What just happened?" Did a long-simmering squabble, or even a multi-way dust-up between many parties, just spill into public view? I think I understand why the VFX folk are unhappy. But I don't get the other side. Why are big name stars like Samuel L. Jackson willing to stand up on a hugely-watched show and diss the digital artists? Why is the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences willing to silence an award-winner who stands up for fellow VFX artists? What's their beef? Here are my very tentative theories:
  • above and below the line Traditionally Hollywood has separated the people who collaborate on a movie into above the line (creative) and below the line (non-creative). When effects work was done using miniatures, matte paintings and rigged sets (so-called practical effects), the work was slotted into the below the line category. Effects workers have complained before that they get less screen credit than the caterers, who have seniority and so are listed first. It has been standard practice in the movie industry to, almost reflexively, knock the below the line people to keep them down, and discourage them from claiming any creative credit.
  • Union vs Non-Union I have pointed out before that the transition from 2D hand-drawn cartoons (like "Snow White") to 3D computer-generated cartoons (like "Toy Story") is also a transition from union to non-union workers. Similarly, the transition from practical effects to digital effects is a move away from unions. I still have a tee shirt I bought at a fundraiser for the "Alliance of Special Effects & Pyrotechnics Operators" (ASEPO). These are the folks who built models and blew them up before the CGI revolution. There is no such union for the digital artists. Jackson & the Oscar folks may be showing union solidarity.
  • Artists vs Geeks Despite the fact that R&H is actually in El Segundo, and dozens of other VFX companies are in Los Angeles County, I've noticed there is a sort of "North vs. South" vibe to the friction between (non-technical) artists and (technical) "geeks" in the movie biz. Steve Jobs and George Lucas both saw this rift and placed their tech-savvy companies (Pixar and ILM) in Northern California. Steve Katzenberg at Dreamworks bought Silicon-Valley-based Pacific Data Images (PDI) for his visual effects arm. I've mentioned this elsewhere, but Hollywood really hates to invest in tech. They want somebody else to take the risk. The tech Oscars usually go to some "nut in a garage" who invented something on his or her own dime and then sold it to a major studio. We may just be seeing evidence of this rift.
  • the threat of the Virtual Actor Okay, the most satisfying theory I have, though not the most plausible, is this: since the early 1990s these geeks have been talking about Virtual Actors (VActorsTM), synthespians, autonomous agents and other forms of jiggery-pokery that are supposed to somehow obsolesce and replace real human actors. Actually, only a vocal minority have talked about this, but the acting community sees it as coming from the tech community, and I think they're sick of hearing about it. I distinctly recall an L.A. SIGGRAPH meeting in the 1990s when a Technical Director (TD) pointed out that a celebrity who'd shot a Fritos commercial (Jay Leno?) wasn't hired back to reshoot it when Frito-Lay changed the bag; they just pasted in a new bag with CGI, using the same tools showcased in movies like "Forrest Gump." This TD wanted to set a marker, that here was a documented case, possibly the first, of an actor not getting work because of CGI. So this may be why the actors are gunning for the digital artists. Actually, I believe the idea of fully replacing human actors (besides extras) is a fraud, as I discuss in greater length in my N-part article, "If It's Just a Virtual Actor, Then Why Am I Feeling Real Emotions?" elsewhere in this 'zine. As a proof point I offer that the most famous robot in movie history, R2-D2 was played by one human (comedian Kenny Baker) and voiced by another (sound designer Ben Burtt).
I am especially eager to find out out what you, my readers, think of all this. Email me your comments and I may reprint them.

Further Excursions in Graph Theory and Social Networks

Nauru Graph, the generalized Peterson Graph, from mathworld.wolfram.com/NauruGraph.html
Divya: Everybody on campus was using it. "Facebook me" was the common expression after two weeks. And Mark was the biggest thing on a campus that included 19 Nobel laureates, 15 Pulitzer prize winners, 2 future Olympians and a movie star. Sy: Who's the movie star? Divya: Does it matter? — The Social Network (movie, 2010) ( www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/_B0034G4P7G/hip-20 )
I have been continuing to delve more deeply into the mathematics and sociology of social networks. Here is an update on my explorations. I previously recommended some popular books on the subject:
  1. Nexus: Small Worlds and the Groundbreaking Science of Networks (2003) by Maek Buchanan ( www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393324427/hip-20 )
    A layperson's introduction to graph theory and network theory as applied to social networks, with an emphasis on recent developments.
  2. Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age (2004) by Duncan J. Watts ( www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393325423/hip-20 )
    Another lay introduction, but with more detail and rigor than Nexus, and was written by a practitioner in the field.
  3. Linked: How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else and What It Means (2003) by Albert-László Barabási ( www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0452284392/hip-20 )
    This lay introduction is also by a practitioner in the field, and gives even more detail.
as well as some rigorous books:
  1. Excursions In Graph Theory (1980) by Gary Haggart
    This is where I started last year when I decided to get serious, but it's really not a good place to start. It's more of a tour of some advanced theoretical oddities.
    ( www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0891010408/hip-20 )
  2. Pearls in Graph Theory: A Comprehensive Introduction (1990) by Nora Hartsfield and Gerhard Ringel
    I got Ringel's book because he taught at UCSC while I was there. It is good but not great. Sorry for the faint praise, but there are so few books on graph theory that every good one is worth having.
    ( www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0087B0FXG/hip-20 )
At this point I would like to add the following popular books:
  1. Bursts: The Hidden Pattern Behind Everything We Do (2010) by Albert-László Barabási
    This book is clearly an attempt at greatness in the popular science writing genre, and I'm not sure it makes it, but I admire the effort. It does give some insights on why the dynamics of networks and how they grow sometimes can cause data streams from those networks to contain clusters or bursts.
    ( www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0525951601/hip-20 )
  2. Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives — How Your Friends' Friends' Friends Affect Everything You Feel, Think, and Do (2011) by Nicholas A. Christakis
    This book is awesome. I read it on paper, and then listened to it read on CD by the author. Christakis is at the forefront of social network research today, and explains it well.
    ( www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0316036137/hip-20 )
as well as the following rigorous books:
  1. Introductory Graph Theory (1984) by Gary Chartrand
    Okay, I'm gonna nominate this one for the best "first book" on the mathematics of graph theory. I wish I'd had this text available in college.
    ( www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0486247759/hip-20 )
  2. Social Network Analysis for Startups (2011) by Maksim Tsvetovat
    This book is for computer programmers, uses the Python interactive computer language, and is light on theory but heavy on examples using real data. If you have to analyze social network data this book is a necessity. Both code and data are also available for free download. I began learning to program in Python (named for the British comedy troupe Monty Python) because of this book.
    ( www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1449306462/hip-20 )
I'm excited about graph theory and its application to social networks for several reasons:
  • The fundamentals of the subject are conceptually simple and visualizable, and the math requires virtually no prerequisites. For these reasons, like Boolean Algebra I think it's a great subject to teach to middle schoolers.
  • There are more high-quality data sources than ever before in human history, and the situation improves every day.
  • There is more available compute capacity than ever before in human history, and that situation also improves every day.
  • There is currently tremendous focus in both industry and academia on the topic. Breakthroughs seem to be falling out of trees. And lay interest is at an all time high due to social networking web sites and apps such as Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Digg, Foursquare, Tumblr, etc.
There are three areas in which I'd like to report:
  1. old school sociology
  2. social data
  3. math

old school sociology

scene from A Clockwork Orange
"You watch out, little Alex, because next time it's not going to be the Corrective School anymore. Next time, it's going to be the barry place and all my work ruined. If you've no respect for your horrible self, you at least might have some for me who's sweated over you. A big black mark, I tell you, for every one we don't reclaim. A confession of failure for every one of you who ends up in the stripey hole." — Mr. Deltoid, social worker, in A Clockwork Orange (film, 1970)
( www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00005ATQB/hip-20 ) The most wide-reaching and informative book in my list above has got to to be Connected (2011) by Nicholas A. Christakis. Dr. Christakis seems to be at the center of both the math and the sociology of the new social network revolution, directing Human Nature Lab at Harvard University (more on him below), ( christakis.med.harvard.edu ) and he does a good job of laying the groundwork, explaining the questions before exploring possible answers. One classic piece of research with a new social network twist that he explains is the Framingham Heart Study. ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Framingham_Heart_Study ) The study began in 1948 with about five thousand adult subjects from Framingham, Massachusetts, and has continued for three generations. The amazing new twist is that recently researches went back to look at the paper records that were created by the study and found that social network information was inadvertently included. Because the researchers wanted to track people for decades, they asked for a list of family and friends that could help find them if they moved and the study lost contact with them. It turned out many of these people had close connections also in the study, and so a part of the social network could constructed, complete with detailed health information over time. By keying this information into computers and analyzing it, 21st century network theorists have discovered in the old Framingham data evidence that obesity appears contagious over social networks. Check out this video, which shows weight gain moving through a network from node to node: ( www.youtube.com/watch?v=8aEtyRD1j5U ) Of course, this triggered some firestorms. Objections ranged from "What about free will?" to "You're demonizing fat people; nobody will want to befriend them." Perhaps it will clarify the situation to say merely that a pattern has been observed, but the kind or direction of causality is not established. The best explanation I've seen of this conundrum is in the essay Style, Grace and Information in Primitive Art by Gregory Bateson, reprinted in Steps To an Ecology of Mind (1972). ( www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0226039056/hip-20 ) Bateson suggests "redundancy" is a good word for patterns of unknown causality:
Any aggregate of events or objects (e.g., a sequence of phonemes, a painting, or a frog, or a culture) shall be said to contain "redundancy" or "pattern" if the aggregate can be divided in any way by a "slash mark," such that an observer perceiving only what is on one side of the slash mark can guess, with better than random success, what is on the other side of the slash mark. We may say that what is on one side of the slash contains information or has meaning about what is on the other side. Or, in engineer's language, the aggregate contains "redundancy." Or, again, from the point of view of a cybernetic observer, the information available on one side of the slash will restrain (i.e., reduce the probability of) wrong guessing. Examples: The letter T in a given location in a piece of written English prose proposes that the next letter is likely to be an H or an R or a vowel. It is possible to make a better than random guess across a slash which immediately follows the T. English spelling contains redundancy. From a part of an English sentence, delimited by a slash, it is possible to guess at the syntactic structure of the remainder of the sentence. From a tree visible above ground, it is possible to guess at the existence of roots below ground. The top provides information about the bottom. From an arc of a drawn circle, it is possible to guess at the position of other parts of the circumference... From how the boss acted yesterday, it may be possible to guess how he will act today. From what I say, it may be possible to make predictions about how you will answer. My words contain meaning or information about your reply. Telegraphist A has a written message on his pad and sends this message over wire to B, so that B now gets the same sequence of letters on his message pad. This transaction (or "language game" in Wittgenstein's phrase) has created a redundant universe for an observer O. If O knows what was on A's pad, he can make a better than random guess at what is on B's pad. The essence and raison d'etre of communication is the creation of redundancy, meaning, pattern, predictability, information, and/or the reduction of the random by "restraint." It is, I believe, of prime importance to have a conceptual system which will force us to see the "message" (e.g., the art object) as both itself internally patterned and itself a part of a larger patterned universe — the culture or some part of it.

The characteristics of objects of art are believed to be about, or to be partly derived from, or determined by, other characteristics of cultural and psychological systems. Our problem might therefore be over simply represented by the diagram: [Characteristics of art object/Characteristics of rest of culture] where square brackets enclose the universe of relevance, and where the oblique stroke represents a slash across which some guessing is possible, in one direction or in both. The problem, then, is to spell out what sorts of relationships, correspondences, etc., cross or transcend this oblique stroke. Consider the case in which I say to you, "It's raining," and you guess that if you look out the window you will see raindrops. A similar diagram will serve: [Characteristics of "It's raining"/Perception of raindrops] Notice, however, that this case is by no means simple. Only if you know the language and have some trust in my veracity will you be able to make a guess about the raindrops. In fact, few people in this situation restrain themselves from seemingly duplicating their information by looking out of the window. We like to prove that our guesses are right, and that our friends are honest. Still more important, we like to test or verify the correctness of our view of our relationship to others. This last point is nontrivial. It illustrates the necessarily hierarchic structure of all communicational systems: the fact of conformity or nonconformity (or indeed any other relationship) between parts of a patterned whole may itself be informative as part of some still larger whole. The matter may he diagrammed thus: [("It's raining"/raindrop.)/You–me relationship)] where redundancy across the slash mark within the smaller universe enclosed in round brackets proposes (is a message about) a redundancy in the larger universe enclosed in square brackets.

We have found a redundancy in the Framingham Heart Study data: if we know who has obese friends at time t1, we can guess they are more likely to become obese themselves at a later time t2. The causality is, so far, unknown. But classic sociology has done some great work preparing the way for social network theory. Just a look through the lifetime accomplishments of social experimenter Stanley Milgram is an education in the subtleties of "human nature" of humans acting in networks. ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Milgram ) And Dr. Milgram did effectively establish causality, unlike a redundancy in some stats. He observed people influencing people directly. One of the big new mysteries in social networks is how people influence. There is strong data that we are influenced by people 3, but not 4, degrees away in the network, when we choose what car to buy, how to vote, what to eat, whether to commit suicide, and other major life decision. Mechanism unknown at this time.

social data

an infographic of social media from kikolani.com I've told you before about a social networks conference I attended at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, PA., sponsored by the North American Association for Computational Social and Organizational Science (NAACSOS). ( www.casos.cs.cmu.edu/naacsos ) I didn't go into detail then, but as far as I could tell the reason the conference was at CMU was that Dr. Kathleen M. Carley was there with the Center for Computational Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems (CASOS), one of the first places in America where you could get a PhD in this stuff. ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathleen_Carley ) ( www.casos.cs.cmu.edu ) Since then there have been explosions of growth in academia of interest in these topics. Of course there is the aforementioned Dr. Nicholas Christakis of Harvard, ( christakis.med.harvard.edu ) who founded and runs the Human Nature Lab there. ( humannaturelab.net ) My friend Philmer sent me a link to a local lecture series at the San Diego Supercomputer Center (SDSC) associated with the University of California at San Diego (UCSD), about network/graph theory and social media. The series is called "UCSD Complex Network Seminar - Different Angles on Network Complexity, Engineering, and Science (DANCES)." ( www.caida.org/workshops/dances/ ) One abstract I found fascinating was entitled "Surprise maximization reveals the community structure of complex networks." ( www.nature.com/srep/2013/130114/srep01060/full/srep01060.html ) It examines the problem of inferring a "real" community from partial and noisy data. There is a traditional measure of a "quality of a partition" of a network into communities, called modularity (Q). This paper proposes:
We recently suggested an alternative global measure of performance, which we called Surprise. Surprise assumes as a null model that links between nodes emerge randomly. It then evaluates the departure of the observed partition from the expected distribution of nodes and links into communities given that null model. To do so, it uses the following cumulative hypergeometric distribution:
    formula for calculating surprise maximization
I have no idea what a "hypergeometric distribution" is but it sounds fascinating. I mention all this because it shows the level of interest and activity in my local academic community. I am confident this is going on all over the map. What will you find if you search your local academic community? Meanwhile in the corporate world a similar explosion continues. Facebook has added an application program interface (API) for bots and other programs to access their social graph data: the Graph API. ( developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/api/ ) The data or just about any page on Facebook, for example my home page, ( www.facebook.com/alan.b.scrivener ) you just replace the "www" with "graph" ( graph.facebook.com/alan.b.scrivener ) and the page is displayed in JSON format.
{ "id": "1653189248", "name": "Alan B. Scrivener", "first_name": "Alan", "middle_name": "B.", "last_name": "Scrivener", "link": "https://www.facebook.com/alan.b.scrivener", "username": "alan.b.scrivener", "gender": "male", "locale": "en_US" }
Javascript Object Notation (JSON) is an open-source format that is both human-readable and machine-readable. (Though I'm not a huge fan of Javascript, I think JSON is the greatest thing since sliced bread — not as bloated as XML.) ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSON ) You get whatever data your permissions allow, so it depends on your "friend" status and the page owner's privacy settings, exactly like with the regular Facebook pages. Piggybacking on the Facebook craze, Wolfram Alpha has offered their own layering of tools on top of the Graph API. If you have a Facebook account you can use free tools at the Wolfram Alpha web site to analyze your social network. ( www.wolframalpha.com/facebook ) sample Wolfram Alpha social graph analysis (portion) While I'm thinking of it, they also have a great little nomenclature for entering simple graphs in for analysis. For example if you type in:
1->2, 2->3, 3->1, 3->4, 4->1
( www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i= 1-%3E2%2C+2-%3E3%2C+3-%3E1%2C+3-%3E4%2C+4-%3E1& lk=3 ) you get a picture of the graph and quite a bit of analysis. sample Wolfram Alpha graph theory analysis (portion) (I should also mention that the full-up, expensive package Mathematica also has extensive algorithms for analyzing graph data. reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/Combinatorica/guide/GraphAlgorithms.html ) On the high end, I recently found out that the National Security Agency (NSA) of the United Sates, in its Pyramid system data scooping that has been the topic of recent scandal, uses a special database optimized for large graphs.
"Neo4j is a robust ... transactional property graph database. Due to its graph data model, Neo4j is highly agile and blazing fast. For connected data operations, Neo4j runs a thousand times faster than relational databases."
( www.neo4j.org ) If you really want some practical experience "where the rubber meets the road," writing programs to use mathematical algorithms on real social data, I can't think of a better plan than to get the above-mentioned book "Social Network Analysis for Startups" and work with the free programming examples and free sample data. (FYI: I found that in getting the Python-based software working on my Mac, I needed the little web page called "Installing matplotlib in Lion." the.taoofmac.com/space/blog/2011/07/24/2222 ) For example, this book will show you how to analyze a network, represented as a matrix of 0s and 1s, to determine the degree of network influence an individual has. There are four popular metrics of connectedness:
  1. celebrity — The number of edges connected to a node; number of "friends" on Facebook; Ashton Kucher's million-pus Twitter followers.
  2. centrality — For example, if you're part of an ethnic family in which nearly everyone knows everyone, you have a lot of influence on, and are influenced by, all of them. Your family as a group may also have "clout" in the larger society.
  3. gate-keeper — A node that is the only link, or one of a few, connecting two sub-networks of high centrality, and becomes a controller of communication between communities; for example, among nations Russia acts as a diplomatic channel between enemies Abkhazia and Armenia.
  4. "the Grey Cardinal" — Sometimes called "the power behind the power," individuals with low connectivity but high influence, by being connected to someone with high connectedness by one of the other three metrics. This is the hardest to detect, because you need more than the 0s and 1s, you need to trace the flow of something. A site like Twitter or Tumblr that allows "re-tweeting" or "re-blogging" provides this, allows us to automatically find these influencers.
network metrics from http://www.frontiersin.org/computational_ neuroscience/10.3389/fncom.2011.00005/full


Peterson Graph tee shirt, from www.zazzle.com/petersen_graph_shirt-235337603224795700
"If numbers aren't beautiful, I don't know what is." — Paul Erdos, as quoted in My Brain Is Open: The Mathematical Journeys of Paul Erdos (1998) by Bruce Schechter
( www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0684859807/hip-20 ) Here are some useful resources on the web for learning the math. Here are some great articles: And there is interactive software to let you play with the ideas: So far I have been giving a fairly breezy tour of my graph theory explorations, but now I'd like to slow down and dig in a little, and talk about applying Wolfram's method. The ideas are profound, I believe, but the calculations are easy (at this scale) and can be done with a pen and paper and some simple, fundamental concepts. What I am interested is the set of all possible networks, explored systematically. (I used a similar methodology in C3M v. 5 n. 2, "Even Better Than the Real Thing," in the section on the set of all possible systems, entitled "EXTRA CREDIT." www.well.com/user/abs/Cyb/archive/c3m_0502.html ) Okay, let's start very simply. The obvious way to go about finding all possible graphs or networks is to sort them by number of nodes. I've found that thinking about a network with zero nodes makes my brain hurt, so maybe we'll come back to it. Consider a network with one node. Since self loops are illegal, there is only one such graph, with Number of Nodes (NN) equal to 1 and Number of Edges (NE) equal to zero. Next consider networks with two nodes. Either they are connected or they are not (NE=0 or NE=1), so there are two possible graphs. And if NN=3, NE can be 0, 1, 2 or 3, and there are four possible graphs. iterating all possible graphs, NN=1,2,3 from csc.columbusstate.edu/bosworth/Research/Dissertation/C02_N01.htm At this point we've actually already encountered a subtle problem. By way of example, a graph with three nodes (NN=3) and one edge (NE=1) could have that one edge in three different places, connecting nodes 1 and 2, 2 and 3, or 1 and 3. And yet our intuition is that those are "the same graph," since the overall shape is the same, any any unique property of one (that didn't refer to the node names in some way) would be a property for all of them. Next consider all graphs with NN=4. iterating all possible graphs, NN=4 and NE=0,1,2,3,4,5,6 from csc.columbusstate.edu/bosworth/Research/Dissertation/C02_N01.htm If you gaze for a while at the above diagrams, two questions pop up: did we miss any, and are there any duplicates? It's quite tricky to tell, especially as the graphs get bigger. This is known as the graph isomorphism matching problem. Notice also that as the Number of Nodes (NN) grows, the Maximum Number of Edges (MNE) grows much more quickly. It is in fact given by the formula: MNE = NN * (NN - 1) / 2 which grows almost as fast as NN squared. But to go at this systematically we need a reproducible method for generating all graphs of a give size NN — an algorithm. To get this done I need to remind you of the standard matrix notation for a simple undirected graph (no direction arrows, self-loops or parallel paths). Consider this graph, with nodes A, B, C and D. a four-node graph (image drawn by dot program from www.graphviz.org) You and I can look at the picture and understand it, but a computer cannot. That's why the graph needs to be expressed as a computer-readable binary matrix. The number of direct paths from A to B is in row A column B. Because there are no parallel paths this is always a zero or one, hence the "binary." The diagonal from upper left to lower right is all zeros, because there are no self loops. (Blue background.) And the lack of direction errors requires that the matrix be symmetric about this same diagonal: if there is a path from A to B, then there must be a path from B to A (and vise versa). This is why the gray background triangle and green background triangle are mirror reflections of each other.
So this matrix contains so much redundancy that we can throw away everything but the gray background triangle and still retain all of the information. Here I've reproduced just that triangle, showing how it has three rows of lengths three (orange), two (red), and one digit (purple), and how I can combine them into a single six digit number.
1 0 1 1 1 0
Now, to get all possible networks with NN=4 I can cycle through all possible combinations of six binary digits (0 or 1), which is the first 2^6 (64) binary numbers, or what we in base 10 call zero through sixty-three. 000000 000001 000010 000011 000100 000101 000110 000111 001000 001001 001010 001011 . . . and so on. If this is gibberish to you, take a side trip to the Wikipedia article on Binary Number. ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_number ) If you have a modern Mac or other UNIX system you can use the bc basic calculator program in a shell to convert binary (base two) to decimal (base ten). Red is the part that you type. Once you set the input base (ibase) to 2, you can type base 2 numbers and they will be echoed in base 10. # bc bc 1.06 Copyright 1991-1994, 1997, 1998, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. For details type `warranty'. ibase=2 101 5 Okay, programmers, sorry for the side trip. Back to the problem at hand. Now we have a way to generate all of the graphs for a given size of NN, but how do we eliminate duplicates? We are back to the graph isomorphism matching problem. One way to help is to come up with various analytics of graphs. In addition to the Number of Edges (NE), we can compute the density (NE/MNE). We can count how many unconnected "islands" there are. We can count the number of edges connected to each node, and produce a sorted list. Each of these metrics can be used to prove that two graphs are non-isomorphic or different, but not that they are isomorphic or the same. Another useful technique is come up with names for some of the more common patterns. Graph theorists have been doing this for a while and have assigned single letters to various well-known graph families. For example: I won't explain them all here; the names are mostly obvious and you can refer to their Wikipedia articles for details. Using the above info, I have generated, by hand, this table of the the set of all graphs of sizes NN=1,2,3,4 with additional data. g1-4_table_WHITE_TEXT.html Each size NN has Tr(NN - 1)^2 entries, where Tr(n) is the Triangular Number of size n, which gives the size we need for the triangular matrix. ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_number ) I have come with a numbering scheme for the graphs, and give the matrix for each one, have a picture drawn again by dot (see above), and some nicknames for the graph, both my own and the mathematicians'. Lastly I show a blue flag if this is the first entry of the graph in the table, or grey if it is a duplicate, and I give the id number of the first graph it matches. Below is a table with the duplicates removed, which reduces the 64 graphs to 11 unique forms. g4_table_BLACK_TEXT.html So, it may be fair to ask: what's the point of all this? Wolfram argued that if we methodically begin looking at all possible examples of a mathematical strucure (of course we can't see them all and have to stop sometime), by visualizing them in some standard manner, it would increase our intuition and lead to breakthroughs. I feel like I have really gotten to know the 11 unique relationships 4 people can have just by each couple being friends or not. I also think I'm beginning to appreciate how large networks get so complicated, though I can't quite put it into words yet. So far I have done this by hand, mostly by visual inspection. What Im doing here can be done by computers, of course. The networks don't have to be very big before the humans are overwhelmed and the machines must take over. A software package called nauty has been released which helps automate what I'm doing, which is of course the above-mentioned graph isomorphism matching. ( ww.cs.sunysb.edu/~algorith/implement/nauty/implement.shtm ) nauty finds two matching graphs But something quite amazing is that it isn't very long before the machines are overwhelmed too. In the final analysis the matching sometimes has to be done "the hard way," which involved re-ordering all of the nodes in a matrix, which takes NN! (Number of Nodes factorial) steps, and at each step comparing two matrices. ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factorial ) This explodes pretty fast. Yet the Mathematica package does have a function in its Combinatorica package called NumberOfGraphs[n], which gives "the number of nonisomorphic simple graphs on n nodes" and I reproduce some values below.
  • reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/Combinatorica/tutorial/Combinatorica.html
  • reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/Combinatorica/ref/NumberOfGraphs.html
    n NumberOfGraphs[n] Tr[n - 1] = (n^2 - n)/2 2^Tr[n - 1]
    0 1 0 1
    1 1 0 0
    2 2 1 2
    3 4 3 8
    4 11 6 64
    5 34 10 1,024
    6 156 15 32,768
    7 1,044 21 2,097,152
    8 12,346 28 268,435,456
    9 274,668 36 68,719,476,736
    10 12,005,168 45 35,184,372,088,832
    11 1,018,997,864 55 36,028,797,018,963,968
    12 165,091,172,592 66 73,786,976,294,838,206,464
    13 50,502,031,367,952 78 302,231,454,903,657,293,676,544
    For comparison I give the triangle number for each n - 1, and 2 to that power, so you can see how quickly the number of non-isomorphic graphs deviates from the total number of graphs. This is still classified as a "hard problem" in math. I suspect Mathematica has it values for the NumberOfGraphs function precomputed in some table. I said above that I might return to graphs with zero nodes, but I've changed my mind. It's the "null graph" and it's navel-gazing. What I encourage you to do is to look at the set of all unique graphs with NN=5 and NN=6; there are 34 and 156 of them respectively. See if you can get to know them on a personal level. Give them nicknames. Wolfram would be proud.


    "If It's Just a Virtual Actor, Then Why Am I Feeling Real Emotions?"
    (Part Five)

    (If you haven't read parts one through four, see the archives, listed at the end.)


    synthespian Max Headroom does a celebrity endorsement
    "I think I'd probably tell you that it's easier to desire and pursue the attention of tens of millions of total strangers than it is to accept the love and loyalty of the people closest to us." — William Gibson, 1996 Idoru [Japanese pronunciation of "idol"]
    ( www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0425158640/hip-20 ) William Gibson didn't drop "Idoru," his science fiction novel about a rock star marrying an artificial personality, until 1996. But there was something in the zeitgeist by the early nineties that seemed to encourage some people to think that computer graphics and virtual reality would somehow help us solve "hard" problems in Artificial Intelligence (AI). When I used to hang out with my friend Kim Levitt in Hollywood, before he died of AIDS in 1991, we watched a lot of episodes of the ABC television show "Max Headroom" (1987). ( www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00005JNU5/hip-20 ) I remember one episode that was quite relevant to the concept of "virtual actors." It was entitled "Deities" and aired 25 September 1987. Here is the "blurb" on it from Wikipedia:
    "The leader of the View-Age church, who happens to be Carter's ex-girlfriend, kidnaps Max from Network 23 and threatens to erase him to prevent Carter from running a story exposing the church's claim of saving its parishioners' minds as AI constructs as false."
    Kim and I agreed on the spot that saving someone's mind in a computer was a flat-out impossibility with current technology. (That's probably because we both programmed computers.) The freaky thing was that we knew other people who believed it was possible. This kind of creeped me out, reminding me of the dollmakers in Japan who would recreate a child that had died, even using their hair, for bereaved parents and grandparents. Sure, there were legitimate activities going. As I've mentioned previously, Steve Tice's company SimGraphics had coined the term VActorTM (Virtual Actor) as a trademark for their performance cartoon company. A few years later, after a frustrating VR game project with Hasbro that didn't come to fruition, Tice met a frozen foods magnate (who my buddies that knew him from Rockwell called the "refrigerator magnet"), and was funded for a project to create computer graphics of dead celebrities for entertainment purposes. If memory serves it was called Virtual Celebrity Productions, a division of Global Icons. The movie "Forrest Gump" (1994) was already in production, and there was a lot excitement in the Los Angeles VFX community about 2D video effects for modifying classic footage, etc. Meanwhile, Greg panos had also left Rockwell, and hustler that he is (I mean that in a good way) he was handing out ball caps at one point that said "1-900-VIRTUAL" which you call for a per-minute fee to get the latest news and gossip on Virtual Reality. He gave me a free sample call, and the one I heard was about the brand of VR headsets used in the video "Even Better Than the Real Thing" by U2. Shortly afterwards Greg got involved with being an evangelist of sorts for 3D scanning and motion capture, and formed the Personaform company to encourage self-scanning by the public and especially persons of note. He recently dredged up and posted a video about it. ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewBkIZFDruE&feature=share ) His "hype" talked about this new technology offering a form of immortality. But I had another friend, who shall remain nameless, who was diagnosed with HIV around this time, and he was very unwilling to die. He began to talk as though he believed that a digital copy of his shape would actually be him, and offer true immortality. (Of course he was not a programmer.) The bad news is that this is pure fantasy. The good news is that, in 2013, he is still alive, an HIV survivor saved not by computer graphics but by pharmacology.


    banner outside Adventurers Club (photo from etixland www.etixland.com/ADVCLUB/ACMain/ACmain.htm)
    "...the real action at Gatorland, the event that brings even the alligators to life, is the Assault on the Dead Chickens, which is technically known as the Gator Jumparoo. I am ... not making this up." — Dave Barry, 1991 "Dave Barry's Only Travel Guide You'll Ever Need"
    ( www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0345431138/hip-20 ) In May of 1993 the company I was working for, Advanced Visual Systems (AVS) held their annual user group meeting at the Dolphin Hotel at Walt Disney World in Florida. The attendees were all doing scientific visualization, and the theme was "The Magic of Science." I really wanted to be there. I prepared a talk called "The Nature of Scientific Visualization," and got it accepted. This turned out to be a great strategic move, because at the last minute budgets were cut and many of my co-workers didn't get to go, but they sent me to deliver my talk.
      cover of Advance Program for AVS '93 User Group
    My friend Steve P. and his wife Jan were also attending -- I think he was presenting about their pressure data from wheelchairs as a tool for treating and preventing chair-sores, what we called the "Buttprint Visualization." The Dolphin Hotel was a freaky place to stay. The lobby was like the inside of a gargantuan Victorian beach tent, with 5-fold symmetry that seemed 4-fold, making it very easy to get lost. Post-Modern prankster Michael Graves designed it. The hallway walls and floors had crayon doodles of beach stuff: starfish, buckets and shovels, sand dollars, towels... A video looping in the rooms had a 9-year-old boy claiming to have designed the hotel. At one point I freaked out and had to go to Walgreen's in Kissimmee, where the aisles are at 90 degrees and the lighting was fluorescent white, just to get some normalcy. ( https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=913&bih=680&q=michael+graves+dolphin&oq=michael+graves+dolphin&gs_l=img.3..0i24.1259.5729.0.6072. ) But most of the time we embraced the weirdness. Perhaps because of the proximity of the Adventurers Club, even the waiters in the lobby bar seemed like drama geeks, doing goofy improv as he took my order for smoked alligator meat sausage appetizers. (In retrospect not such a good idea, the gator.) And speaking of gators, as I always seemed to during those days, I made a mix tape for my Florida trip. I called it "Gator Jump-A-Roo" after the Dave Barry anecdote (above), and on the cover I put a picture of the Mardi Gras pool at one of the New Orleans themed Disney hotels. pool at Port Orleans French Quarter Hotel, Walt Disney World, Orlando; pic from AllEars.net land.allears.net/blogs/guestblog/2008/04/
    The eclectic blend of music included the "Exotica" faux-tropical stylings of Los Angeles-based Martin Denny, such as his jolly "Jungle River Boat." ( www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IuqsB29jR8 ) My wife and I sat around in Steve and Jan's hotel room while Steve worked on his presentation, and I brought a boom box playing the "Gator Jump-A-Roo" mix tape. Eventually I dragged my wife off to see the Adventurers Club, which I'd been ranting about for about three years now. Jan wanted to stay, but then after we left she changed her mind and tried to meet up with us to no avail, and ended up back at the gator appetizer place drinking alone. Steve left the audio tape (running time approx. 90 minutes) on auto-repeat until about two repetitions, and then turned it off. Meanwhile, I got to show my significant other "the club." It was better than I remembered. She loved it. We had a wonderful time, and the next night we managed to get Steve and Jan there too. As before, the scripted stuff was great: the Mask Room, the Treasure Room, the New Member Induction Ceremony in the Main Salon, the shows in the Library, such as the Balderdash Cup, the Maid's Cabaret, and the Radiothon. All this stuff is documented on the web by fanboys and girls, and some of it is on YouTube. But the real magic of the club was the unexpected, real-time improv with the unwitting cooperation (or sometimes witting) of the guests. Once, a character of a gypsy woman, the rarely-seen Madame Zarkov, was climbing around at the base of the statue of "Zeus Goes Fishing" when she broke a glass, and a guest cut herself on the broken glass. Another character named Pamelia Perkins, the club president, appeared and, entirely in character, had the guest fill out an accident report after offering her a bandaid. I was later able to confirm that the actress playing Pamelia thought the actress playing Zarkov had screwed up royally (as did I), but none of this was said overtly at the time. What was overt was that the whole routine was hilarious to observe, at least to me. Over time we got to see these characters as familiar friends, even though different performers played the parts on different nights. (Wikipedia has a good summary of the club's characters.) ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adventurers_Club ) Of course I was there to work and during the day I did. I helped man a booth at the user conference, and at the appointed time (10-10:45 AM 25 May 1993) I delivered my talk, "The Nature of Scientific Visualization." I was nervous because I had to compete with some other talks that sounded interesting, including:
    • Applications of AVS in Earth Sciences at Oxford
    • MAPLES and AVS ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maple_(software) )
    • The Practical Use of AVS to Aid the Visualization of 3-D Semiconductor Device Simulation
    • Parallel Processing Support for GIS ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GIS )
    • The Weather on Jupiter
    • Visualization of Airflow of a Rat's Nasal Airway...
    but in fact my talk was standing room only. One day I plan to post a transcription of it. AVS93 program page 6


    view of Shark Reef at Typhoon Lagoon from http://www.ourlaughingplace.com/asp/ attraction.aspx?attractionID=SR#.UWhUOIKF43A
    "Ahmet Ertegun used this towel as a bathmat six weeks ago at a rancid motel in Orlando, Florida, with the highest mildew rating of any commercial lodging facility within the territorial limits of the United States, naturally excluding tropical possessions . . . It's still damp. What an aroma!" — Frank Zappa, 1971, "Im Stealing the Towels" from 200 Motels (soundtrack album) ( www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0000009SB/hip-20 )
    Pardon me if I digress, but I'm remembering a series of strange dreams I had in the 1980s, of traveling to Disney World with friends and trying to get them to stay up on old Orange Blossom Trail, but then finding we had to travel by canal to get there, and my friends refusing to ride in the canal boats. This was before I found out that OBT was (and is) where the prostitutes and drug dealers are most likely to be found, which became apparent in 1990 when I stayed in an old motel surrounded by both, and swore I would never return to it. So in May 1993 when the AVS user conference ended, I took my pregnant wife (did I mention she was 5 months pregnant?) to a water park, "Typhoon Lagoon," before we planned to drive to the space coast (Florida Atlantic) for one day and then fly back to California. Typhoon Lagoon was themed like a tropic port that had been ravaged by winds and waves, and I always find it to be utterly charming. We discovered in on our 1989 trip when our friend Bob said he couldn't ride any more "boats past dolls" (such as EPCOT's "River of Time" in the Mexico pavilion), and we ended up paddling inner tubes around the "infinite river" at Typhoon Lagoon, which they call "Castaway Creek." It turns out being able to steer is a good antidote to theme park burn-out. Then in the afternoon it began to pour rain. Our first thought was "we're already wet; we'll just stay in the water." But as we've learned many times before, it isn't the rain, it's the lightning that's a hazard in Central Florida. We were ordered out of the water, and found ourselves in a very long line to get towels and retrieve our dry clothes from our locker. To stall for time we ducked into the shark aquarium, themed to look like a capsized boat (see photo above). Inside we were out of the rain, and the splashing raindrops looked cool looking up from below at the surface of the water, but we began to shiver even in the Florida heat. FInally we got our towels and clothes, and bought more dry clothes in a gift shop, and made our way to the rental car, where we sat sopping trying to towel off and change. That's where my pregnant wife said, "I think I'm catching a cold." I realized I needed to bail on the plan to drive an hour east, and get her right into a bed. As fate would have it, this visit was winding down at an interesting annual cusp in time. Mid-May is a rather slow time at Walt Disney World, until you reach Memorial Day Weekend, when the summer season kicks off with one of the busiest weekends of the year. We were right on that divide, and the room we'd just checked out of was booked solid. I know, I called. Everywhere I called was booked solid. Finally I remembered that skuzzy motel on Orange Blossom Trail where we'd stayed in '90 and I'd returned in '91. They had a room. When we got there the some of the stairs were collapsed, the ceiling tiles were caved in, the bed had a spring sticking up and there was moss growing in the shower. But the sheets were clean and the plumbing worked. I tucked my sick wife in and went out for a drive in the rain, returning some hours later (giving her time to sleep) with some kind of health-looking take-out. After I woke her up and fed her, I asked if she wanted to go back to sleep until the flight out in the morning. No, she told me, she was feeling better, and she wanted to go back one more time to the Adventurers Club. And so we found ourselves waiting outside of the club in the rain. It normally opened at 7:30 PM (as I recall) but it was after 9:00 and still closed. Finally the staff let us in. Soon we found our favorite actress, playing Ginger Vitus the maid, and she was doing a slow burn. She told us there'd been a couple of inches if water on the floor of the main salon, due to leaking rain, and most of the actors and staff thought they shouldn't have opened at all that night, but management just wanted to make money (the bar being a big cash cow) and so they had it pumped out and fan-dried in a hurry. The fans were still running in the corridor leading to the restrooms. As irate as she was about the situation, she was very friendly to us, and we bonded a bit in the adversity. We began to "penetrate the veil" a little. When she wandered off with her feather duster to work the room, my wife and I conferred, and decided to invite her to brunch the next day. When we walked back up to her and I popped the question, she gave us a "deer in the headlights" look, and I wondered how many other such invitations she had refused over the course of playing adventurers. "Tell her why," my wife suggested. Improvising, I said, "Because we think this club represents a brand new form of interactive entertainment, and we're fascinated and want to learn more." With some hesitancy, she said yes! I reflect sometimes on the number of turns of fate that could've gone differently that lead up to us making this appointment.


    Google satellite view of Cross Roads Shopping Center, 12549 County Road 535, Orlando, FL 32836
    "Why did directing this play appeal to you? I like puzzles. I'm not really a conspiracy geek, but I like puzzles and I like mysteries. There's a lot of trying to determine what is real and what is not. You don't know all the answers at the end." — Anne Hering, interviewed October 2009 ( http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_stage_theat/2009/10/30-seconds-with-anne-hering.html )
    We met for brunch at a reasonable hour the next day. It was somewhere in a shopping center called Crossroads Center (aerial photo above), as I definitely remember buying my still-sick pregnant wife some vitamin C at the Goody's Supermarket in the same complex. The restaurant might have been "Perkin's" which would actually been an interesting connection, since the woman we were meeting often played Pamelia Perkins, Adventurers Club President. ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adventurers_Club#Characters ) ( advclub.wikia.com/wiki/Cast_of_Characters ) In addition to Ginger the maid, we had also seen her Samantha Sterling, and before that I'd seen her as Mandora. But at this point we still didn't know her real name. She introduced herself as Anne Hering. (A year later I would tell her I remembered a Monty Python routine about an 'alibut, but never an 'herring. She pointed out that it was a very old routine, and I was showing my age.) Out of character and in person she reminded me a bit of Anne Francis, very witty and expressive and obviously talented.
      Anne Hering as Mandora, in the Adventurers Club Mask Room
    Over brunch she was kind enough to regale us with tales of the club. She kept insisting she was the wrong person for this though. "You need to meet Kris," she kept saying. She said she was involved in a number of acting projects in central Florida, and arranged to only work part time at the club so she could go to auditions, rehearsals, and performances for these other projects. Kris was full time, and had been there from the beginning. We told her that there was something very special about the Adventurers Club, like nothing we'd ever experienced before. She said that one was reason was that the Imagineers who designed the place insisted that Disney employ actors in the union, the Actors' Equity Association. ( www.actorsequity.org ) Some of the shows at Walt Disney World were staffed by people who just wandered in and applied at the Casting Center, but the song and dance numbers tended to be equity folk with real training and talent. It made sense to me; most of the Adventurers had uncanny talents of improvisation and — yes, I'll say it — crowd control. Anne again alluded her annoyance with how management saw the club as an alcohol cash cow, and how finessing the drunks was a challenging part of the job.
      a portion of a drink menu at the Adventurers Club
    I was able to compare notes with her about the incident of the actress playing the gypsy who broke the glass that cut a guest. Anne wasn't very fond of her, because of some unprofessional incidents like this. On a hunch I asked if there were "groupies," people who became overly attached to the cast. Yes, of course, she confirmed. (I realized that a challenge to getting this brunch date was to not look like one of them!) But also, unexpectedly, she told us there were Disney cast groupies, i.e., members of the the Walt Disney World "cast" (all employees there were called cast members — it's a show!) who used their employee discounts to attend the Adventurer's Club all the time. Some of them were as troublesome as the other groupies. Amazing. She kept reiterating "you need to meet Kris." I finally asked who she meant. Kristian Truelsen, she explained, was an original cast member from the club (unlike Anne), still working full-time (unlike Anne), who was obsessively devoted to the mythology and backstory (also unlike Anne I presumed), as well as the artistry of impromptu theater (a passion which Anne did share). ( www.kristiantruelsen.com ) Kris was also keeper of "the book," a guide to all of the artifacts in the club, begun by imagineers but maintained by cast members, which fanciful backstories for each zebra cabinet and poison dart. She also mentioned that the main Imagineer behind the club was Joe Rohde, and we might seek him out for information. (She revealed that his picture was hidden in the Adventurer's Club library somewhere.) We told her we thought the club represented a new and unique form of entertainment and that we really appreciated her talents as an interactive actor. She told us that she hadn't appreciated this until one night at the club she had gone in to work in a poor mood, having just experienced a disappointment in her love life. She met an old lady from Eastern Europe who looked like the trope of the wise old crone, with a scarf over her head and everything, who told Anne that she didn't realize how important her work was, and how many people it touched. She took it to heart, and looked at it as a nobler calling since. Too soon the magical time was over. Lastly we exchanged mailing addresses for further communication.


    ======================================================================== newsletter archives: www.well.com/user/abs/Cyb/archive ======================================================================== Privacy Promise: Your email address will never be sold or given to others. You will receive only the e-Zine C3M from me, Alan Scrivener, at most once per month. It may contain commercial offers from me. To cancel the e-Zine send the subject line "unsubscribe" to me. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I receive a commission on everything you purchase from Amazon.com after following one of my links, which helps to support my research. ======================================================================== Copyright 2013 by Alan B. Scrivener
  • Last update: Mon Dec 30 18:43:48 PST 2013