Measured at 2,200 feet AMSL, near the junction of Empire Grade and Pine Flat
September, 2009
As the first rain of the season gently drizzles outside, I am announcing that 2009 is the last year of rainfall measurements from Emerald Forest Lane. I have moved away, and there is no longer anyone willing to report the measurements from this location. These pages will remain as a permanent record, however. A big thank you to all who have helped through the years.
July 2008 | . |
. |
. . |
. . |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. | . | . |
. | . | . |
Total: | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
August 2008 | . |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. | . | . | . |
. | . |
. |
Total: | ||||
September 2008 | . |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. . |
. |
. | . |
. | Total: | |||||||
October 2008 | 4th: 1.35" |
. |
. |
: . |
. |
. |
. |
. | . |
. . |
. |
. |
31st: .5" |
Total: 1.85" | ||||||
November 2008 | 1st: 5.9" |
2nd: 1.82: |
4th: 1.75" |
. |
9th: .25" |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. . |
. |
. | . | 26th: .05" |
27th: .5" |
Total: 10.27" | ||||
December 2008 | . | . | . |
13th: .13" |
14th: .04" |
15th: 1.17" |
16th: .51" (snow) |
17th: .1" (ice) |
19th: .47" |
22nd: 1.46" |
23rd: .23 |
24th: .08" |
25th: 1.46" |
26th: .18" |
. |
Total:5.32" | ||||
January 2009 | 2nd: .03" |
3rd: .55" |
6th: .22" |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. | . |
. |
22nd: .92" |
23rd: .52" |
24th: .18" |
25th: .04" |
26th: .11" |
Total: 2.57" | |||
February 2009 | 5th: .36" |
6th: .56" |
7th: .65" |
9th: .65" |
11th: .65" |
12th: .56" |
13th: .97" |
14th: .54" |
15th: .89" |
16th: 5.8" |
17th: 1.08" |
18th: .75" |
22nd: .36" |
23rd: 5.5" |
24th .85" |
25th: .05" |
26th: .43" |
27th: .03" |
28th: .04" |
Total: 20.72" |
March 2009 | 2nd: 1.3" |
3rd: .91" |
4th: 1.02 |
5th: .6" |
. |
. |
15th: .12" |
16th: .3" |
17th: .18" |
. |
23rd: 1.23" |
24th: .03" |
. | . |
. | Total: 5.72" | ||||
April 2009 | . |
. |
8th: .7" |
9th: .16" |
10th: .37" |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. . |
. |
. | . | Total: 1.23" | ||||||
May 2009 | . |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. . |
. |
. | . | Total: | |||||||
June 2009 | . |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. . |
. | . | Total: | |||||||
Seasonal Total | 47.50 Inches |
Just for comparison, you can look at a table of rainfall totals for a few previous seasons:
After a warm September, October brought in welcome moisture on the 4th, reducing the fire danger. Overall, a very dry October, but more welcome rains finally arrived on Halloween. And on November 1st, the skies really opened up with nearly 6 inches overnight. Winter had begun with a bang. But despite the seasonal temperatures, it remains drier than normal.
Winter returned on December 12, with much colder temperatures and welcome moisture. Snow, sleet and thunder was on the mountain the night of the 15/16th, followed by frigid temperatures on the 20's. More rain moved in on the 19th and the 22nd. Christmas day was cold, wet and windy. Light rain continued into early January, but so far, significant amounts are not here yet. Mid-February brought cold temperatures and steady rain to the coastal mountains. And we finally had the first significant rain on the 16th, with almost 6 inches falling in that one day. February turned out to be a near-normal month for rainfall, and March is off to a good start as well. Spring began warm and pleasant, and then the night of the 22nd brought rain, hail cold wind and light snow to the mountain. Spring really sprung in early April, and welcome showers arrived on the 7th, adding to the greenery.
I keep these unofficial readings as a personal interest. I have seen our reading exceed other gauges that are located at lower elevations nearby, so I figured this might be of interest to others. For rainfall amounts up to 11 inches, we now use a NWS certified rain gauge. In the past, when amounts overnight were higher than 5 inches, I had to use a vertical wall bucket at least a few times every winter. The new gauge should be able to handle all but the most extreme rainfall.
In years past, I was distrustful about the unusually high rainfall readings, changing gauges and trying various methods and locations to improve accuracy. However, after much experimentation, and then checking with our neighbors, I think we are simply in a micro-climate with more rain than other places. This is the Santa Cruz Mountains, after all. As the Weather Service says, we are in an "Orographically Favored Location." I think that means we get soggy when others simply get wet.
During the 2005-2006 season, I added an electronic gauge. It used to sit next to the "analog" gauge. After a number of seasons, I gave up trying to use it. It easily clogged, and required much more maintenance that the "analog" gauge. The old fashioned method was just more reliable.
There is one official California Department of Water Resources weather monitoring site located nearby, at a slightly higher elevation. They match my readings here at 2200' fairly well. You can compare for yourself, at Ben Lomond Mountain (2630', three miles up the road from here). Their measured rainfall tends to be slightly less, but the temperature tracks pretty close to our location.
There are also a couple of other nearby, lower elevation locations where rainfall is measured. One long-time measurement created by Ted Cantrall is here, and another very informative site, run by the folks at Anometal.com can be found here.
As with most places in this region, we are in a "micro-climate". Ours happens to be very wet during the rainy season, due to our location, elevation and southern exposure to incoming storms. During large storms, average winds of 40 to 60 mph are typical here. In December of 1995, we had winds approaching 100 mph, and during February, 1998, peak winds approached 85 mph. The season is officially measured from July 1 to June 30, although rain usually only falls between September and May, a typical "dry and wet" seasonal pattern. Snow does fall here, but it is usually not more than a few inches at a time. The temperature range is not too extreme, and only falls below 25 degrees a few weeks every winter. 1991 was the exception, with lows in the teens for over a week. The winters of 1973, 1975, 1982, 1986, 1995, 1998, 2001, 2002 and 2006 brought significant snowfall.
If you found your way to this page via a search engine, please refresh or reload the page for the latest updates.
You can return to the Home page here.