March 28, 2008
        
      Iraq — Band of brothers      
      
        Consensus: Stop-Loss is sincere and 
          complex, and features strong performances, but it also veers into 
          overwrought dramatic territory and tries to cover too much ground. (Rotten Tomatoes) 
       
      The logic behind the film Stop-Loss is simple: 
      
        How does a government handle its military needs if there’s no draft?  
        Rely on the patriotic instincts of its young men to volunteer. (Yes, 
          the modern military includes women, but day-to-day combat — the 
          nitty-gritty of any war — is still very much a man’s sphere.) 
        What does a government do if the war goes sour and the pool of volunteers begins to dry up? 
        Stop-loss. According to Title 10, United States Code, Section 12305(a), 
        
          the President may suspend any provision of law relating 
            to promotion, retirement, or separation applicable to any member of the 
            armed forces who the President determines is essential to the national 
            security of the United States. 
         
        What does a volunteer do who has reached the end of his service — and the end of his psychological rope — if he is stop-lossed? 
        He goes AWOL. Kathy Dobie reported in Harper’s that as of 2005, some 5,500 people had gone AWOL. As stop-losses accelerated, so did desertions. In 2007, Courage To Resist, an organization that supports war resisters, said the count was up to 40,000. 
        How does a government stop the flow of deserters? 
        By relying on the ethos of honor and mutual protection that develops 
          on the battlefield. Soldiers may enlist from a sense of duty or 
          patriotism, but in the end they fight to save the lives of themselves 
          and their comrades. (It seems difficult to make dramatic territory like 
          this “overwrought.”) 
       
      There’s an odd convergence between this position and the loopy yellow
        ribbon of the bumper stickers or refrigerator magnets. Support Our 
        Troops: that’s exactly what those guys in Baghdad and Fallujah and Basra
        are trying to do. 
      It’s one of those cases where the form is similar but the content is 
        different. Imagine that you have two shiny red apples. They look the 
        same. But cut them open, and you’ll discover that one is hollow — no 
        content at all, just skin; the other is loaded with fruit. 
      The hollow apple can be found on any number of websites — for example, America Supports You, which is run by the Department of Defense; Soldiers’ Angels, which bears the slogan “May No Soldier Go Unloved”; Operation Support Our Troops, “about our troops, for our troops”; and Support Our Troops,
        a blanket site that provides a list of similar-minded websites. They 
        endeavor to provide useful information about Vet centers and clinics, 
        but much space is devoted to a kind of USO work, soliciting letters and 
        packages for servicemen and women engaged in what is apparently a 
        generic war. 
      The war faced by the soldiers in the movie Stop-Loss is 
        anything but generic. It’s composed of specific sights and sounds, with 
        actions based on strong individual relationships. They’ve seen — and 
        through the wonders of modern technology, filmed — the slaughter by 
        Americans of women and children. They’ve faced the terror of ambushes by
        seemingly invisible attackers on city streets. And all they have left 
        is one another. 
      Yes, this shiny red apple is loaded with fruit. But it’s stinking rotten, and our soldiers know it. 
      In the middle of March, Iraq Veterans Against the War and a number of other veterans groups conducted a hearing at the National Labor College in Silver Spring, Maryland. The event was reminiscent of the Winter Soldier Investigation of 1971,
        where more than a hundred people testified about human rights 
        violations they had witnessed in Vietnam. Like the earlier hearing, the 
        one this year was ignored by the mainstream media. But members of the indy media were there. Amy Goodman described the event on Democracy Now: 
      
        Last weekend, in the lead-up to the fifth anniversary of 
          the invasion of Iraq, a remarkable gathering occurred just outside 
          Washington, D.C., called Winter Soldier: Iraq and Afghanistan, 
          Eyewitness Accounts of the Occupations. Hundreds of veterans of these 
          two wars, along with active-duty soldiers, came together to offer 
          testimony about the horrors of war, including atrocities they witnessed 
          or committed themselves…. 
        What followed were four days of gripping testimony, ranging from 
          firsthand accounts of the murder of Iraqi civilians, the dehumanization 
          of Iraqis and Afghanis that undergirds the violence of the occupations, 
          to the toll that violence takes on the soldiers themselves and the 
          inadequate care they receive upon returning home. 
       
      The atrocities should surprise no one, says former marine corporal Jason Washburn. 
      
        The more guys we lose, personal friends, the less the 
          guys really care what damage they did to the area and the people that 
          got killed. 
       
      It’s all there, in Stop-Loss. 
              — Copyright Betsey Culp 2008 
         |